Ways of Thinking About Technology

In: Uncategorized

Commitment:
  • Words: 540
  • Sentences: 26
  • Grade level: 10.4-13.7
  • Read time: ~2.7 min @ 200WPM

20 Nov 2008

image Two recent blog posts, one from Paul and Timothy Bible Conference the other from Justin Buzzard’s Buzzard Blog
offer some helpful thoughts about social networking. The conclusions
and recommendations are excellent, and I think there is room for developing a model for getting to these kinds of conclusions.

(Similarly, there has been a recent discussion of the pros and cons of Twitter at Christ and Pop Culture and a response by Owen Strachan.)

“This Can Be Used for…” Thinking

The
main idea in both articles is that “Facebook can be bad but, if used
properly, Facebook can also be a force for good.” Both authors offer
helpful lists of possible good and bad uses of Facebook. Buzzard’s is
very practical while P&T seems to be more high level. I think these
are the kinds of excellent conclusions and recommendations that we need to be
talking about in the church.

However, somtimes this kind of discussion can be a bit misleading. It has the possibility of making someone assume that because something “can be used for good” it automatically should. That can leave a reader or listener to think that we should primarly evaluate
technology on the basis of morality and usefulness. Buzzard writes,

Technology
(most, not all) is neutral and can be used for good or ill… Internet …
Dispense truth or porn… Approach technology with this lens: neutral,
good or ill.

Here, he means that technology is morally neutral. Buzzard's full presentation goes beyond this idea though to say that facebook itself is not really neutral and that it can have some effects on us just by using it.

Facebook and online life can make you more distracted, changes how you think/attention span (Buzzard)

Buzzard recognizes that Facebook itself – not just how it is used, but that it is used – tends toward distraction. This means that while Facebook may be morally neutral, it is not inherently neutral. This is an excellent way of thinking about a technology like facebook, and I think Buzzard has made some major strides in that direction.

“How Will this Technology Change Me?” Thinking

Instead
of limiting our thinking about technology to the possible moral ends,
we need to think of technology in terms of what it
demands of us and how it will influence us whether it is used for good
or bad ends.

In other words, when we evaluate a technology we need to begin, not on moral grounds or with possible good or bad ends, but with its inherent effects on us. Then we need to compare those influences to our theology of Christian Spirituality and Mission.

A Model for Theological Reflection on Technology

  1. Nature of the Technology
    – Start by asking questions like, What does this technology inherently
    demand of me? What influence will it have on me? How does it affect my
    thinking, my relating, my day-to-day actions?
  2. Theological Grounding
    Ensure that you your theology is robust and well thought out in the
    following areas: What is a human? What is a human relationship? What is
    way of being and doing for which God has made us?
  3. Theological/Technological

6 Responses to Ways of Thinking About Technology

  1. Avatar

    Justin Buzzard

    November 20th, 2008 at 2:52 pm

    John, I think had you heard the message in person (as my disclaimer stated, I taught from/posted a sparse outline and filled in many details while speaking and did a lot of nuancing)and known the theological grounding of our church you would’ve been less critical of the post.

  2. Avatar

    John Dyer

    November 20th, 2008 at 2:59 pm

    @Justin, I didn’t at all mean to be critical of your post. I really thought it was great and had some very thought provoking points. I just wanted to present a model for thinking about these things broader than just the single issue. Perhaps I need to be more clear about that. Thanks for pointing out how I came across.

  3. Avatar

    Robert Johnson

    November 20th, 2008 at 2:59 pm

    Your model on theological reflection on technology asks “What is way of being and doing for which God has made us?” which I think is probably the most important question of the section. It seems that much of the mantras/lies of technology are completely antithetical to the core message of the gospel. Thanks for providing this model.

  4. Avatar

    Carey

    November 20th, 2008 at 5:44 pm

    Greetings John!

    This is Carey from the Paul and Timothy guys. Thanks for your post. I thought it was very thought provoking and added much more to the discussion of Christian media.

    I’m assuming you went to Dallas to get your ThM? I’ll begin my ThM next fall at Western Seminary. Any thoughts to convince me to come to Dallas? :)

    Great to meet you, and blessings to you as we continue to spread the gospel of Christ in all contexts.

    Carey

  5. Avatar

    busby seo test

    January 12th, 2009 at 11:40 pm

    thanks for sharing your ideas i really appreciate it!keep it going and more power!

Leave a Reply

Additional comments powered by BackType

About this blog

John DyerI'm John Dyer a web developer working on sites like Best Commentaries, Bible Web App, Dallas Seminary. I'm also a seminary graduate and teacher at Irving Bible Church.

This blog is about the the role of technology in the redemptive movement from the Garden to the City. I believe technology is an amazing testament to the creativity embedded in the imago dei, but instead of assuming technology is always a neutral tool, I believe it - like culture in general - profoundly influences us.

Upcoming Posts

  • What Are They Advertising?
  • Jesus, James, and McLuhan On the Heart, the Tongue, and the Internet
  • A Definition of Technology
  • The Cornwall Alliance: Technological Theory at Work
  • Reading and Publishing and Publishing and Reading
  • Learning from Buber: I-Thou and I-It
  • Prepackaged Communion and Albert Borgmann’s Device Paradigm
  • Technology is Kinda Like Money
  • Approaching Technology like We Approach Money
  • John Dyer: Paul, Yes, in a later post we'll talk about the debates in the early church about the meaning of im [...]
  • John Dyer: Lee, for sure! Moving from Oral to writing communicates a sense of authority and permanence. [...]
  • John Dyer: I can't remember about that one. If you find something and can draw some meaning from it, I'd love t [...]
  • John Dyer: God also spends much of the Pentateuch giving blueprints for various elements of worship. The point, [...]
  • Lee: Interesting points. Also, I would mention that delivering the 10 commandments on carved stone wa [...]

Asides

Our brains are designed to more easily be stimulated than satisfied
Fascinating look at the science of the brain’s response to seeking and rewards: http://www.slate.com/id/2224932/ (1)

Roman Catholic Church Expresses Concern Regarding Social Technologies
The head of the British Roman Catholic church says,

“I think there’s a worry that an excessive use, or an almost exclusive use of text and emails means that as a society we’re losing some of the ability to build interpersonal communication that’s necessary for living together and building a community.”
(0)

Internet Fatigue
CNN has a report on the phenomenon of internet fatigue. I wish they would have spent more time on giving suggestions for how to understand why this happens and how to avoid it. (0)

Articles and Tools on Texting
The NYTimes has a new article on the effects of texting on youth which include anxiety, sleep deprivation, and hand injuries. Interestingly, as Andy Crouch points out, the article also mentions that teens send many texts to their parents, meaning that teens are now connected to their parents more often during the day – a time when teenagers of the past were developing independence. LG has also created a new site to help parents decode text messages. (0)

Course Syllabus: Writing for Nonreaders in the Postprint Era
A humorous, but enlightening syllabus for a class on writing in the “postprint” era. Writing for nonreaders in the postprint era: “Students will examine why former generations carried around heavy clumps of bound paper and why they chose to read instead of watching TV or playing Guitar Hero.” (0)

Language Shapes Our Worldview
A psychology professor at Stanford University found that in languages with gender, the gender assigned to an objects tends to shape the way a speaker views that’s object. For example, in Spanish, “bridge” is masculine so Spanish speakers describe bridges as “strong” and “dangerous,” while German speakers for whom bridge is feminine tend to describe bridges as “fragile” and “beautiful.” Perhaps our own understanding of words like redemption, wrath, and adoption are also shaped by unseen factors. (0)

Survey Says Facebook Users Get Lower Grades
A study from educational researches at the Ohio State University found that students who regularly used facebook only study 1-5 hours per week and had GPAs in the 3.0-3.5 range, while non-facebook users study around 11-15 hours per week with GPAs in the 3.5-4.0 range. I wonder how church education compares? (0)

Risk-Reducing Technologies Increase Risk-Taking
The Pope and a Harvard scientist make an interesting argument that AIDS is increasing in Africa precisely because of condom distribution. More... (0)