This is part 4 of 5 considering the implications of Neil Postman’s Lecture, “Five Things We Need to Know about Technological Change” for the church. I have re-titled it, “Five Things We the Church Need to Know about Technological Change.”
Remember that youth group illustration for sin where you put a drop of food coloring in a glass of water, mix it up, and then ask the audience if there is any way to “unmix” it? It’s a powerful visual meant to show that once we sin, we are changed, and we can’t go back to our former, pure state.
This illustration is also apt for what happens when a technology enters the world. New technology is not merely added alongside other things, it changes the world it enters and alters the relationships that existed before.
The church too has experienced technological change in an ecological, not additive way. Of course, the changes are not always “bad,” but major shifts in the church can be traced to technological changes:
Just as the church was never the same after the printing press and the megachurch, churches will continue to change from recent technologies, perhaps most significantly from the Internet.
Hopefully, by realizing that technology is ecological rather than merely additive, we can guard against trends which would make the body of Christ into the cyborg of Christ :) But as my good friend Josh points out, the Spirit seems to work his way both in spite of and through technology. So let us be like Sons of Issachar, who “understood the times” (1 Chron. 12:32) and be wise, neither fully embracing, nor fully rejecting technology.
Additional comments powered by BackType
I'm John Dyer a web developer working on sites like Best Commentaries, Bible Web App, Dallas Seminary. I'm also a seminary graduate and teacher at Irving Bible Church.
This blog is about the the role of technology in the redemptive movement from the Garden to the City. I believe technology is an amazing testament to the creativity embedded in the imago dei, but instead of assuming technology is always a neutral tool, I believe it - like culture in general - profoundly influences us.
bleek
January 2nd, 2009 at 1:50 pm
“There is no charge for awesomeness.”
Bronson Taylor
January 2nd, 2009 at 10:55 pm
It seems like there are three phases currently present:
1) Offline Churches – no tech involved (builders)
2) Additive Churches – we have a church web site (boomers)
3) Ecological Churches – we have small groups on tokbox (busters)
What do you think? BTW, I’m really enjoying your blog. It’s one of the few that I read completely.
John Dyer
January 3rd, 2009 at 9:27 am
Bronson, thanks for your kind words about the blog!
Of course, the web is not the only technology that we use or that affects us ecologically. Even the presence of the old “church van” influences what kinds of ministries we’ll do.
But, in regards to [i]Internet[/i] technologies I’m inclined to say that your proposed taxonomy would be accurate in regards to how deeply a church has integrated the Internet into their activities. The deeper the integration, the more ecological it becomes. Even the additive category though will have some shifts like fewer bulletins (in favor of a web calendar), but the shifts will be more minor.
Lex
January 7th, 2009 at 9:12 am
Still really enjoying this series.
Have you read The Millennium Matrix by Rex Miller (have I asked that already)? Miller talks about how technology/communication changes our worldview and how it relates to the church. Really, really good stuff.
100 Hundreds
January 14th, 2009 at 12:59 am
Five Things We the Church Need to Know about Technological Change (4 of 5): Technology is Ecological, not Additive
Sam X
March 23rd, 2009 at 2:25 pm
Is it just me or are #2 and #4 in this series cut off?
Thanks
John Dyer
March 23rd, 2009 at 2:37 pm
Sam, thanks for catching that. I transferred my blog from another system to Wordpress recently, and it looks like those posts were mangled. They are fixed now. If you see anything else, let me know.