Tools for Tech Thinking: McLuhan on Twitter
- Words: 439
- Sentences: 33
- Grade level: 8.2-10.7
- Read time: ~2.2 min @ 200WPM
The first question we usually ask about technology is “How can this technology be used?” However, as stewards of creation the deeper questions that we should first ask are, “What does it mean to use this technology?” and “How will using this technology affect people?”
Thankfully, there are great thinkers out there than can have developed tools we can use to better understand the nature of a technology. In this first installment, we’ll look at Marshall McLuhan’s Four Laws of Media (also called the Tetrad) from his book Laws of Media and apply them to Twitter as an example.
1. What does Twitter extend?
A car extends our feet and ability to travel. A phone extends our voice and ability to communicate.
- Twitter also extends our voice, but in a very specific way. It extends our ability stay “in conversation” about our daily activities and thoughts.
2. What does Twitter make obsolete?
On a technology level, the car made riding horses obsolete. On a human level, cars make walking to a destination obsolete.
- Twitter makes obsolete older tools like a quick Budweiser “Waaas Up?” phone call, a blog post, or an email. On a human level, it can also make obsolete catching up conversations around a water cooler .
3. What does Twitter retrieve?
A few hundred years ago, when people lived in small communities and worked together regularly, everyone knew what everyone was up to. Today’s large cities take this away.
- Twitter, along with a lot of social technologies, can retrieve this age-old sense of connectedness. For friends who live in different cities or work in distant offices, Twitter can retrieve the sense of knowing what one’s friends are doing and thinking.
4. What does Twitter reverse into if it is over-extended?
This is McLuhan’s “negative” question where he gives examples like the ability to project one’s voice is lost if the microphone is overused and the ability to walk long distances is lost when one relies on vehicles.
- Twitter can connect physically distant individuals, but when overused it can also isolate a person from those who are physically near (like spouses) reversing into a state of more disconnectedness.
- Twitter can also reverse into a level of shallowness, because communication is limited to 140 characters.
- Twitter can also reverse into a mess of noise and distraction since so many voices are speaking at the same time.
Of course, this is not an exhaustive understanding of Twitter (or McLuhan’s thoughts!), but just applying these four questions sheds a lot of light on what Twitter is.
In the comments, feel free to apply McLuhan’s questions to another technology!
- Tags: community, friendship, mcluhan, social networking, twitter
17 Responses to Tools for Tech Thinking: McLuhan on Twitter
Leave a Reply
Additional comments powered by BackType
- Entries (RSS)
- Email subscription
About this blog
I'm John Dyer a web developer working on sites like Best Commentaries, Bible Web App, Dallas Seminary. I'm also a seminary graduate and teacher at Irving Bible Church.
This blog is about the the role of technology in the redemptive movement from the Garden to the City. I believe technology is an amazing testament to the creativity embedded in the imago dei, but instead of assuming technology is always a neutral tool, I believe it - like culture in general - profoundly influences us.
Upcoming Posts
- What Are They Advertising?
- Jesus, James, and McLuhan On the Heart, the Tongue, and the Internet
- A Definition of Technology
- The Cornwall Alliance: Technological Theory at Work
- Reading and Publishing and Publishing and Reading
- Learning from Buber: I-Thou and I-It
- Prepackaged Communion and Albert Borgmann’s Device Paradigm
- Technology is Kinda Like Money
- Approaching Technology like We Approach Money
Categories
- Bible and Theology (14)
- Books and Texts (17)
- Code Commentary (4)
- Media Ecology Experiments (7)
- Our Technological World (39)
- Quotes (10)
- Spiritual Formation (9)
- Tools for Tech Thinking (17)
- Uncategorized (8)
- John Dyer: Paul, Yes, in a later post we'll talk about the debates in the early church about the meaning of im [...]
- John Dyer: Lee, for sure! Moving from Oral to writing communicates a sense of authority and permanence. [...]
- John Dyer: I can't remember about that one. If you find something and can draw some meaning from it, I'd love t [...]
- John Dyer: God also spends much of the Pentateuch giving blueprints for various elements of worship. The point, [...]
- Lee: Interesting points. Also, I would mention that delivering the 10 commandments on carved stone wa [...]
- The 10 Commandments: Where the Medium Was the Message
- Location, location, location
- ECHO Conference and MediaElement.js
- Around the Web
- Technicism and the World Cup
- Around the Web
- A Christian Definition of Technology
- Corporate Sin: We Wanted BP to Cut Corners
- Steve Jobs: Tablets to PCs are like Cars to Trucks
- Are Chapter and Verse Numbers Making Us Stupid?
Jason Taylor
February 9th, 2009 at 9:51 am
I’ll venture to share that up until reading your post, I’d never heard of McLuhan. I’ll have to do some more research on him at some point BUT, thanks for introducing me to these questions. I immediately began to think through these four questions in terms of our new business model at work; and then started thinking through their application in just about any sphere of life. Could I potentially use these 4 questions to help me make big decision? I’m a big proponent of simple tools that help us clarify what’s important.
If I’m going to do anything, then I need to make sure I’m extending the right thing, keep a pulse on what goes by the wayside if I move forward, make sure that I’m retrieving that which has the highest value and think cautiously so as not to overextend and end up reversing the initial intent.
John Dyer
February 9th, 2009 at 11:34 am
Jason, you’re right that McLuhan’s questions could probably be applied to any new venture, whether it be a new family tradition, business model, or church program.
Michael Krahn
February 9th, 2009 at 11:35 am
John,
I’m excited to have discovered your blog (via Justin Taylor)
Far too few Christians are aware of McLuhan’s importance and continued relevance.
“Understanding Media” should be required reading for any non-Amish church leader.
Michael Krahn
February 9th, 2009 at 11:37 am
PS – Go get it if you don’t already have it:
http://tiny.cc/undermedia
Rhett Smith
February 9th, 2009 at 2:52 pm
John,
Great post, that’s all I have to say. We have talked about this before in person, and I always remember your quote from…was it Freud? about the same steamboat that allowed me to cross the seas, took my son off to college…something like that. What was it? Help me out?
rhett
Scott Lenger
February 10th, 2009 at 4:06 pm
Wow, this is the first time I’ve visited a blog concerning faith and technology that actually has substance (rather than mindless drooling at techno-wizardry or regurgitating “web 2.0″ banter.)
In regards to this post, I’m not familiar with McLuhan…yet! But I find the “negative” question raised by point 4 absolutely fascinating.
John Dyer
February 16th, 2009 at 8:58 am
Scott, just wanted to say thanks for your kind words. I hope the blog is helpful and not just “adding to the noise”!
Paul
February 10th, 2009 at 5:23 pm
Just came across your blog this afternoon. Love it! Keep up the great work!
John Dyer
February 16th, 2009 at 9:10 am
Paul, glad to hear it!
Rich Bordner
February 11th, 2009 at 12:26 am
As far as the paradox of Twitter goes (on one level, it connects physically distant people, but on another level, it isolates you from those closest to you if over relied upon; it can extend conversations, but tends to make them shallow, etc), that applies to most social media sites: myspace, facebook, etc.
As a teacher, I see this all the time with cell phones: students will be walking in groups, but no one is interacting; they are all texting other friends and bumping into people in the process. As far as communication goes, thats like preferring Cheetos to a steak dinner every night.
Most of the time, students are unaware of all this because they have never known a time when these things were ubiquitous.
Another quick example: you can “keep tabs” on folks, but this has a definite downside. Rather than finding out who is dating whom, just check out her facebook profile.
Somethin’s not right with that, IMO…
John Dyer
February 16th, 2009 at 9:02 am
I came across a teacher’s blog taking about an assignment he gave to his students where they reflected on their “hyper connectivity.” The students had a lot of good things to say, and it seems like the assignment went over better than just telling the kids they were doing something wrong (which I see a quite a bit.)
Ben Wiles
February 13th, 2009 at 3:46 pm
John,
I am another one that has not heard of McLuhan before, but I found this post very interesting. These are important questions to ask.
As a pastor who is passionate about the use of technology, I can confess that I find it tempting to get lost in the technology itself and lose sight of the fact that it is means to an end – not an end in itself.
These types of questions provoke honest conversations about what we are doing and why we are doing it. Everything was nice and wonderful until we get to question #4 and then BOOM we see the negative side of technology. The potential drawbacks are real, but I don’t think it should stop us from using the technology any more than the potential to hit my thumb should stop me from using a hammer. But we need to be proactive in dealing with the risks, putting structures and relationships in place to pre-emptively deal with these drawbacks.
Thanks for this insightful post. You are now in my Google Reader!
John Dyer
February 16th, 2009 at 9:03 am
Ben, for pastors and church leaders I recommend Shane Hipps’ (who is a pastor himself) book “Flickering Pixels.” It is a great introduction to the history of how technology influences society and the church.
Sam X
March 23rd, 2009 at 12:26 pm
@”Scott Lenger” I’ll second your comment about this blog being a rare find…this is what I’ve been looking for for months now!
@John, this is an excellent, simple framework for thinking about technology. I’ll be applying this to Facebook and wikis as well for a report I’m working on. Thanks!
Sam X
April 15th, 2009 at 6:37 pm
Here’s a (partially complete) matrix of these 4 laws applied to Twitter, Facebook, Wikis, and Cell Phones
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=drshrbc_438hh69zd68
John Dyer
April 16th, 2009 at 10:08 pm
Wow Sam! That’s some great work!
iñigo
March 19th, 2010 at 7:01 am
Homo Modernus, Tratatus Philosophicus
If in a parallel universe Ludwig Wittgenstein and Marshall McLuhan had married, their robot child would have created something like this animation. We hope you will enjoy it.
Complete version:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZRuGGXAxew
Single episodes (13):
http://www.youtube.com/user/Homomodernus#g/c/CA29679D4BA1F556