Google CEO on Internet Learning vs. Book Learning

In: Our Technological World

Commitment:
  • Words: 237
  • Sentences: 11
  • Grade level: 10.6-14.0
  • Read time: ~1.2 min @ 200WPM

8 Mar 2009

Google CEO Eric Schmidt was on Charlie Rose Friday night (3/6/9) to talk about all things Google and technology. It’s a fascinating discussion (privacy, group learning, etc.), but I just want to point one thing he had  to say about the learning in the information age:

I worry that the level of interrupt, the sort of overwhelming rapidity of information — and especially of stressful information — is in fact affecting cognition. It is in fact affecting deeper thinking. I still believe that sitting down and reading a book is the best way to really learn something. And I worry that we’re losing that. (quote starts: 42:00 )


This is important to people of faith because in our attempts to be relevant and “speak the language” of the culture, we sometimes forget that today’s mediums influence a core part of being a Christian – loving God deeply with our minds. In our fervor not to fall behind technologically, we sometimes end up being more excited about a technology’s potential than those outside the church. Instead of falling behind in implementation, we fall behind in understanding.

We do well to  use websites and new media to reach people for the Kingdom, but we must remember to keep our identity as a people of the book, however irrelevant that might be.

If you don’t believe me, ask the CEO of the most powerful company in the world.

(HT: Nicholas Carr)

3 Responses to Google CEO on Internet Learning vs. Book Learning

  1. Avatar

    Aaron Shafovaloff

    March 9th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

    What a wonderful video… thank you so much for posting it.

  2. Avatar

    Sten-Erik Armitage

    March 13th, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    Thanks for this! I see this trap frequently. I love technology, and am easily caught up in the latest fad or innovative method to the point where I lose sight of the mission.

    That said, If I have a choice to read something on a screen or on the page, the page wins every time. Books FTW!

    • Avatar

      John Dyer

      March 14th, 2009 at 9:42 am

      It does seem that the screen and page are good for different things! The screen is better at quick info-tainment, but the book seems better for undistracted learning.

Leave a Reply

Additional comments powered by BackType

About this blog

John DyerI'm John Dyer a web developer working on sites like Best Commentaries, Bible Web App, Dallas Seminary. I'm also a seminary graduate and teacher at Irving Bible Church.

This blog is about the the role of technology in the redemptive movement from the Garden to the City. I believe technology is an amazing testament to the creativity embedded in the imago dei, but instead of assuming technology is always a neutral tool, I believe it - like culture in general - profoundly influences us.

Upcoming Posts

  • 3D TV Means Color TV is New Black (and White)
  • What Are They Advertising?
  • Jesus, James, and McLuhan On the Heart, the Tongue, and the Internet
  • A Definition of Technology
  • The Cornwall Alliance: Technological Theory at Work
  • Reading and Publishing and Publishing and Reading
  • Learning from Buber: I-Thou and I-It
  • Prepackaged Communion and Albert Borgmann’s Device Paradigm
  • Technology is Kinda Like Money
  • Tristan Mason: John, I'm looking forward to that post. It seems to me that Jesus' coming was, in one way, the tran [...]
  • John Dyer: Paul, Yes, in a later post we'll talk about the debates in the early church about the meaning of im [...]
  • John Dyer: Lee, for sure! Moving from Oral to writing communicates a sense of authority and permanence. [...]
  • John Dyer: I can't remember about that one. If you find something and can draw some meaning from it, I'd love t [...]
  • John Dyer: God also spends much of the Pentateuch giving blueprints for various elements of worship. The point, [...]

Asides

Our brains are designed to more easily be stimulated than satisfied
Fascinating look at the science of the brain’s response to seeking and rewards: http://www.slate.com/id/2224932/ (1)

Roman Catholic Church Expresses Concern Regarding Social Technologies
The head of the British Roman Catholic church says,

“I think there’s a worry that an excessive use, or an almost exclusive use of text and emails means that as a society we’re losing some of the ability to build interpersonal communication that’s necessary for living together and building a community.”
(0)

Internet Fatigue
CNN has a report on the phenomenon of internet fatigue. I wish they would have spent more time on giving suggestions for how to understand why this happens and how to avoid it. (0)

Articles and Tools on Texting
The NYTimes has a new article on the effects of texting on youth which include anxiety, sleep deprivation, and hand injuries. Interestingly, as Andy Crouch points out, the article also mentions that teens send many texts to their parents, meaning that teens are now connected to their parents more often during the day – a time when teenagers of the past were developing independence. LG has also created a new site to help parents decode text messages. (0)

Course Syllabus: Writing for Nonreaders in the Postprint Era
A humorous, but enlightening syllabus for a class on writing in the “postprint” era. Writing for nonreaders in the postprint era: “Students will examine why former generations carried around heavy clumps of bound paper and why they chose to read instead of watching TV or playing Guitar Hero.” (0)

Language Shapes Our Worldview
A psychology professor at Stanford University found that in languages with gender, the gender assigned to an objects tends to shape the way a speaker views that’s object. For example, in Spanish, “bridge” is masculine so Spanish speakers describe bridges as “strong” and “dangerous,” while German speakers for whom bridge is feminine tend to describe bridges as “fragile” and “beautiful.” Perhaps our own understanding of words like redemption, wrath, and adoption are also shaped by unseen factors. (0)

Survey Says Facebook Users Get Lower Grades
A study from educational researches at the Ohio State University found that students who regularly used facebook only study 1-5 hours per week and had GPAs in the 3.0-3.5 range, while non-facebook users study around 11-15 hours per week with GPAs in the 3.5-4.0 range. I wonder how church education compares? (0)

Risk-Reducing Technologies Increase Risk-Taking
The Pope and a Harvard scientist make an interesting argument that AIDS is increasing in Africa precisely because of condom distribution. More... (0)