Dostoevsky’s 1984 Saved Him from Our Brave New World

In: Bible and Theology| Books and Texts| Our Technological World| Spiritual Formation

Commitment:
  • Words: 434
  • Sentences: 19
  • Grade level: 12.4-15.6
  • Read time: ~2.2 min @ 200WPM

2 Jun 2009

1984 vs. Brave New World

In the introduction to Amusing Ourselves to Death, Neil Postman contrasts the worries about future technology by Aldous Huxley in Brave New World (1932) and George Orwell in Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949). Though much has been made about the totalitarian government depicted in Nineteen Eighty-Four, Postman highlights how Orwell and Huxley’s contrasting worries play out in information and importance. While Orwell worried that good information would be hidden by a scary government, Huxley worried good information would be hidden in a pile of insignificance.

Postman’s words were recently amazingly illustrated by Stuart McMillen. Here is one of the panels

Orwell-Information

Huxley Informatino

Dostoevsky in a 1984 world

Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoevsky (Best Novel Ever?)While we seem to live in a Brave New World, the Russian author Fyodor Dostoevsky, whom many consider to be the best novelist of all time, lived in a totalitarian 1984 like world. Because of his beliefs, his books were censored and after a mock execution he was exiled to Siberia.

But instead of destroying him, it turns out that his time in prison might have been the very thing that made transformed him from a brilliant writer to the the one of the most insightful Christian thinkers of all time.

During his exile, the only reading material that he had was a copy of the New Testament and Psalms. Though he was raised in the Orthodox church, he describes this as the time in which he came to know Jesus and experienced conversion. With no access to anything but the most significant literature ever written, he read the Scriptures over and over until it completely saturated him. And it formed his mind to create the highest of art.

Information Deprivation vs. Information Overload

Postman points out two major concerns:

  1. The kind of information we intake is insignificant.
  2. The amount of information we intake overshadows what little significant information we do intake.

In other words, if you read a passage of Scripture in the morning, then later consume lots of TV shows, blogs, and advertisements, it doesn’t matter if the content is morally good or morally bad, the sheer volume of information will dilute anything truly great and tend you toward seeking more and more insignificant material.

I have to ask myself: am I really a more intelligent, loving, godly person because of my constant access to the never ending stream of news? I imagine Dostoevsky would have longed to have the remainder of the Old Testament – do I long to be saturated by God’s word as much as I long for new interesting tech news?

How about you, are you satured with the significant or overwhelmed by the meaningless?

3 Tweets 10 Other Comments

13 Responses to Dostoevsky’s 1984 Saved Him from Our Brave New World

  1. Avatar

    Michael

    June 2nd, 2009 at 9:24 am

    Ray Bradbury said his book, “Fahrenheit 451,” was not about gov’t oppression of books. (Funny, he could have fooled me into thinking that.) It was about the effect of technology on books. And on that, I agree with him. The TV of “451″ pushed out books, just like it and other entertainments do today, whether or not someone burns your books. I read a short story not too long ago about a book lover holed up on a river island as angry citizens stood on the other shore, ready to burn his compound down, because he dared still read books. Then I thought, “Whom is this author kidding? The average American today doesn’t care if or what you read, and never will.” Market forces will tamp down how many saleable books come out. The true book lover will have a harder and harder time enlarging his or her library with new, good books in the future.

  2. Avatar

    @mediapeople (Nathan Davis)

    June 2nd, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    Brilliant man. Love this post. I love the books mentioned too. You have sent me on a tangent and quest to write more on the subject. Appreciate the work of putting this post together and your blog.

  3. Avatar

    Rhett Smith

    June 2nd, 2009 at 3:23 pm

    Brilliant post…Dostoevsky is what caught my eye of course…I consider him the greatest writer of all time myself.

    What Postman has to say at the bottom of your post is so fascinating. I’m having to re-think a lot of stuff, and I believe that like Dostoevsky, that when we so saturate ourselves with something (be it the bible, technology, exercise, etc.) it begins to shape who we are.

    The question is, what am I allowing to shape me then? I hate to say that it’s often not Christ as I drown him out in the noise of everything else…..sigh.

    Rhett

  4. Avatar

    Phillip Gibb

    June 8th, 2009 at 7:58 am

    I definitely live in a world where there is an unending stream of information and mediums of disseminate that information. It seems that anyone can provide information; credible or not. If there is a Big Brother out there then his circuits are going to be blown very soon, lol.

    Maybe it behooves us as Christians to be ever watchful of that stream and to keep the Word on tap – close, often and consistent. That is a challenge to me – Morning Quiet times just don’t cut it when the day is spend numbing oneself up against the deafening hum of information.

  5. Avatar

    Drew Goodmanson

    June 16th, 2009 at 7:10 pm

    btw- reminded me of one of my favorite technology quotes:

    "The danger of the internet isn't necessarily the porn, but the continued wasting of time to find the next great thing." Dr. Michael Goheen

Leave a Reply

Additional comments powered by BackType

About this blog

John DyerI'm John Dyer a web developer working on sites like Best Commentaries, Bible Web App, Dallas Seminary. I'm also a seminary graduate and teacher at Irving Bible Church.

This blog is about the the role of technology in the redemptive movement from the Garden to the City. I believe technology is an amazing testament to the creativity embedded in the imago dei, but instead of assuming technology is always a neutral tool, I believe it - like culture in general - profoundly influences us.

Upcoming Posts

  • The Cornwall Alliance: Technological Theory at Work
  • Learning from Buber: I-Thou and I-It
  • Five Upcoming Books on Technology and Faith
  • Prepackaged Communion and Albert Borgmann’s Device Paradigm
  • What Can Hard Drives Teach Us about Forgiveness?
  • Approaching Technology like We Approach Money
  • Aristotle’s Ethics and the Goal of Online Relationships
  • Speed and Suffering
  • Technology Metaphors in Literature
  • I marginalize my father through technology

Asides

Our brains are designed to more easily be stimulated than satisfied
Fascinating look at the science of the brain’s response to seeking and rewards: http://www.slate.com/id/2224932/ (1)

Roman Catholic Church Expresses Concern Regarding Social Technologies
The head of the British Roman Catholic church says,

“I think there’s a worry that an excessive use, or an almost exclusive use of text and emails means that as a society we’re losing some of the ability to build interpersonal communication that’s necessary for living together and building a community.”
(0)

Internet Fatigue
CNN has a report on the phenomenon of internet fatigue. I wish they would have spent more time on giving suggestions for how to understand why this happens and how to avoid it. (0)

Articles and Tools on Texting
The NYTimes has a new article on the effects of texting on youth which include anxiety, sleep deprivation, and hand injuries. Interestingly, as Andy Crouch points out, the article also mentions that teens send many texts to their parents, meaning that teens are now connected to their parents more often during the day – a time when teenagers of the past were developing independence. LG has also created a new site to help parents decode text messages. (0)

Course Syllabus: Writing for Nonreaders in the Postprint Era
A humorous, but enlightening syllabus for a class on writing in the “postprint” era. Writing for nonreaders in the postprint era: “Students will examine why former generations carried around heavy clumps of bound paper and why they chose to read instead of watching TV or playing Guitar Hero.” (0)

Language Shapes Our Worldview
A psychology professor at Stanford University found that in languages with gender, the gender assigned to an objects tends to shape the way a speaker views that’s object. For example, in Spanish, “bridge” is masculine so Spanish speakers describe bridges as “strong” and “dangerous,” while German speakers for whom bridge is feminine tend to describe bridges as “fragile” and “beautiful.” Perhaps our own understanding of words like redemption, wrath, and adoption are also shaped by unseen factors. (0)

Survey Says Facebook Users Get Lower Grades
A study from educational researches at the Ohio State University found that students who regularly used facebook only study 1-5 hours per week and had GPAs in the 3.0-3.5 range, while non-facebook users study around 11-15 hours per week with GPAs in the 3.5-4.0 range. I wonder how church education compares? (0)

Risk-Reducing Technologies Increase Risk-Taking
The Pope and a Harvard scientist make an interesting argument that AIDS is increasing in Africa precisely because of condom distribution. More... (0)